The Blame Game

The Left has been disparate to demonize conservative as violent and angry, ignoring violence and riots on the Left and blaming any incident of violence or terrorism on the Right. The most recent example of this can be found in the case of John Patrick Bedell, an obviously insane person who was killed whire shooting up the Pentagon. Despite the fact that he was a registered Democrat, was vehemently anti-Bush, and was critical of capitalism, the media worked to classify his as a right-wing extremist. The same tactic was taken when Andrew Joseph Stack flew a plan into an IRS building in Texas — despite his rantings against capitalism and organized religion, and in support of socialized medicine, the media again labeled him a right-wing extremist. This meme is well in line with the political narrative that people on the Right are somehow more unstable and prone to violence than those on the left.

Following the last attack, some conservative pundits, such as Michelle Malkin and Zombie, have pointed out that in the case of Bedell, and probably of Stack, insanity was the issue, and not politics, and it did conservative no good to play the political blame game.

Nice Deb takes issue with this argument, and points to the points that John at Verusm Serum makes with regard to the blame game.

John Points out two major patterns regarding political violence: 1) Violence against the Right at the hands of the Left is commonplace, and 2) The media downplay violence at the hands of the Left, and quickly assign blame for violence on the Right, even when that violence is committed by the Left.

[T]hese are the patterns that exist. Liberals commit violence with regularity. The press ignores, downplays or outright lies about it as a matter of course.

The blame game is already being played and those of us on the right are perpetually the ones being blamed, even when the evidence strongly points in the other direction (Joe Stack and John Bedell).

Taking the high road is an honorable approach. Unfortunately, the NY Times is not honorable. If every one of these charges is not strongly rebutted, the big lie will set in. I believe we have a responsibility to set the record straight. And if that means turning the blame back where it belongs or pointing out the pattern of violence on the left, then so be it.

I guess it comes down to this. The “blame game” isn’t a game. The charge of right-wing extremism (much of it driven by the SPLC) has been one of the chief tools used by Democrats against their conservative opponents since Obama took office. Refusing to play out of principle is choosing not to fight a public relations battle which conservatives can’t afford to lose.

John makes a compelling case, and I although crazy is crazy, I think that there may be something to associating violence to particular political mindsets. Violence is largely a tool of the Left. Right-wing extremists tend to be separatists, and Left-wing extremists tend to be revolutionaries. The Tea Party movement, which is depicted by the media as violent and dangerous, more typically understands its objectives as a “restoration” to constitutional ideals, rather than a “revolution.” Yet the phrase “Stop bitching, start a revolution” appear on t-shirts and bumper stickers popular with the Left. Tea Party protests are always orderly and non-violent, whereas Left-wing protests often dissolve into riots. Can any Tea Party compare to the violence that routinely accompanies the G-4 or G-8 conferences, or even the Democratic National Convention?

Advertisements

, , , , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Conservative Graphics on Sun 07 Mar 2010 - 13:21

    Great post! Very much appreciated.

    During the 60s and 70s the left justified their anger by teaching themselves it was okay to hate the war – because war is bad.
    During the Bush years they justified their anger by teaching their children it was okay to hate him – because Bush was bad.
    Now they teach their children it’s okay to hate Rebublicans.

    And if they lose as much control in 2010 and 2012 as I believe they will – they’ll be dangerously angry…

  2. #2 by JeremyAdkison on Sun 07 Mar 2010 - 14:53

    Again, the constant hype of revolutionary rhetoric is still NOT coming from the left. We aren’t telling people to over throw the government, to stockpile weapons and ammunition, etc. etc. etc. The list goes on.

    I think regardless of anti-government perpetrators of violence, the rhetoric effects the entirety of the Fright Wing- regardless of where they stand politically. The fact that conservatives get so defensive about this is, in my personal opinion, admittance to the fact that their unhinged rhetoric in response to loosing an election is in fact very close to promoting flat out violence.

    But, that’s just my opinion Heretic and I’m sure it’ll make your head go boom. 🙂 🙂

    • #3 by The Republican Heretic on Sun 07 Mar 2010 - 18:04

      So let me get this straight. The far left shows a history of violence and revolution. The far left spends eight years during the Bush administration calling for open revolution, holding violent protests, accusing Bush of causing 9/11 and stealing elections. And this proves that the right is advocating violent revolution?

      And you still haven’t told me what right-wing pundits are calling for open revolt. Who? Who on the right is calling for a revolution, violent or otherwise? No one. The most you’re getting from the Tea Party is a call for a third party. No one is telling anyone to stockpile weapons and ammunition. Your list may go on and on, but there’s nothing on it.

      I’m also amused at your assumption of guilt through denial. Let’s see — we have a string of liberal nutjobs engaging in violent acts, which are being blamed on conservatives. And conservatives are getting defensive about it. So that proves that conservatives are culpable? When did you stop beating your wife?

      And there is no “unhinged rhetoric” coming from the right because we “lost” an election. The rhetoric coming from the right is because the current president and congress are advocating major political changes that will completely destroy the American economy and grant an excessive amount of power to the government to control people’s lives. That the government is seeking, let alone gaining, such power should make you nervous, too.

  1. The Republican Heretic
  2. Murder as Politics « The Republican Heretic
  3. Five Names in Liberal Violence « The Republican Heretic
  4. NPR Fearmongering “Patriots” « The Republican Heretic

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: